data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8110/e81100a17b8dcedc040ddd58d344223b26cbde67" alt="Fp64 of gtx 1080 ti vs classic gtx titan"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e432/1e432f8d665e79e188b4430ad594f25f108e3948" alt="fp64 of gtx 1080 ti vs classic gtx titan fp64 of gtx 1080 ti vs classic gtx titan"
I recommend the RTX 2060 over the GTX 1660 Ti, but it's not the best option for everyone. It's simply better in every way aside from the base and boost clock speeds, but you can overcome with this overclocking as RTX 2060 cards come with superior coolers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e41c5/e41c515e5e412809f44106f1ea6244813dc588cb" alt="fp64 of gtx 1080 ti vs classic gtx titan fp64 of gtx 1080 ti vs classic gtx titan"
Other advantages the RTX 2060 has over the GTX 1660 Ti include increased memory bandwidth. You also have ray tracing and Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) enabled on the card. The RTX 2060 makes mine meat of games and it costs less than 0 for all this additional headroom. While the GTX 1660 Ti is capable of 1440p gaming, it's not as powerful as the GTX 1070 (though it does match it in some games), which itself can sometimes struggle with more demanding games at this resolution. With the GTX 1660 Ti, you're likely to replace it sometime in the future if you wish to move up to 1440p and 4K gaming. Why I recommend this is the RTX 2060 offers more performance for the money and would hold up longer over time before needing to be replaced. The RTX 2060 is more expensive than the GTX 1660 Ti, but it's well worth spending more than you initially wanted to. For 2160p 4K, we were able to play Overwatch 2, Valorant at 66 fps to 139 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 102 fps. For 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Borderlands 3, Anthem, Need For Speed: Heat, Just Cause 4, Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War at 62 fps to 77 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 70 fps.įor 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play GreedFall, Hitman 2, Death Stranding, F1 2019, Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 at 64 fps to 70 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 68 fps. Even if the GTX 1660 Ti consistently delivers frame rate increases over the GTX 1060 6GB, the gain is not much to justify an upgrade. Unfortunately, gaming performance was not quite as impressive. In our synthetic benchmarks, the GTX 1660 Ti blows past the GTX 1060 6GB and, amazingly, even the GTX 1070 as well. After taking the time to fully test the Turing graphics card inside the GTX 1660 Ti, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend. NVIDIA ’s x圆0 cards have always been defined by entry-level prices with performance that knocks on the door of mid-range graphics cards – especially when overclocked. The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future The higher the better.Ĭurrent CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the The higher the better.ĤK performance at 2160p resolution. The lower the better.įull HD performance at 1080p resolution. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card. Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and Don't try and blame me if you break something when acting upon my advice.The release year of the graphics card. Ti | Fractal Design Core 1500 | Corsair CX450MĬore i5-4590 | Intel Stock Cooler | Gigabyte GA-H97N-WIFI | HyperX Savage 2x4GB DDR3 | Seagate 500GB | Intel Integrated HD Graphics | Fractal Design Arc Mini R2 | be quiet! Pure Power L8 350W quality 7.1) | VRMark 7,004 (VR Ready)Ĭore i3-6100 | CM Hyper 212 EVO | MSI H110M ECO | Corsair Vengeance LPX 1x8GB DDR4 | ADATA SP550 120GB | Seagate 500GB | EVGA ACX 2. Project White Lightning (My ITX Gaming PC): Core i5-4690K | CRYORIG H5 Ultimate | ASUS Maximus VII Impact | HyperX Savage 2x8GB DDR3 | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB | WD Black 1TB | Sapphire RX 480 8GB NITRO+ OC | Phanteks Enthoo EVOLV ITX | Corsair AX760 | LG 29UM67 | CM Storm Quickfire Ultimate | Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum | HyperX Cloud II | Logitech Z333īenchmark Results: 3DMark Firestrike: 10,528 | SteamVR VR Ready (avg. While the Pascal GTX Titan X will offer best in class gaming performance when it launches, it will still come in at an eye-watering price of $1200 and leave the budget FP64 compute crowd without the "old style" Titan of their dreams. Now Nvidia has confirmed that the Pascal GTX Titan X will not feature increased FP64 and FP16 rates over GP104, making the Titan X an Ultra-powerful Gaming GPU and nothing more. With the release of the Maxwell Titan X that changed, with the Titan X having the same Double precision compute scaling/ rates as their GTX Gaming counterparts, taking away the attractive budget compute properties of the Original GTX Titan. The original GTX Titan GPU had a unique characteristic that made it popular for more than just gaming, it had support for Double Precision, FP64, compute, allowing people to access some huge amounts of compute performance at a price that is much lower than Nvidia's Tesla or Quadro GPUs. Nvidia Pascal Titan X will not feature faster FP64 or FP16 performance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8110/e81100a17b8dcedc040ddd58d344223b26cbde67" alt="Fp64 of gtx 1080 ti vs classic gtx titan"